from Informed Comment
John Paul II was a complex man and among the more intellectual popes in history. Because of his admirable stance against Stalinism in Eastern Europe (which did not in fact involve any denunciation of communism or socialism per se) and his anti-abortion stance, he is often claimed as an ally by the American Right (which is mainly Protestant and mainly about the best interests of wealthy business people).
But John Paul II was often an inconvenient man, whose moral vision would be upsetting to the US Republican establishment if it were taken seriously. He opposed the death penalty, to which George W. Bush is so attached. He opposed the Iraq War. He condemned laissez-faire capitalism and cared about the exploitation of workers, who he felt should have a dignity that is seldom bestowed upon them by the Walmarts and other firms in the US. And he cared about the rights and welfare of the Palestinian people in a way that virtually no one in the American political establishment does. He symbolically blessed the Palestinian claim that Jerusalem is the eternal capital of the Palestinian people.
That is, the Pope's message sometimes had a strong progressive content, and he was in some important ways on our side. That progressives might have had differences with him on some issues should not forestall our celebrating his progressive legacy. The American Right appropriates shamelessly anyone who even halfway agrees with them. We on the left must learn to make sectional alliances and commemorate those areas of agreement we have with people like John Paul II.
1 comment:
Another thought... This pope was dealing with different political and religious conditions from his predecessors. So to say that he was more progressive is not saying much.
For example, if Bush came out and said he was anti-slavery, I wouldn't consider him a humanitarian for it. But go back to the days before the Civil War, it would have taken a very courageous leader to take such a position. I think the Pope could have done a heck of a lot more than he did. Maybe he took some good positions, but he had the conditions where he could have gotten by with taking stronger positions.
I admit I am not a catholic, a christian, or even a deist, but I have never once considered the pope a role model for ethical behavior, which is what he should have been.
Post a Comment