Thursday, June 04, 2009

Subjects, naturally. But subjective?

New York Times:

[T]he idea that women may inherently view the law differently on occasion is something that troubles even several female judges who believe it may be so.

You have to admit it's troubling to think that women judges might "see things differently" than an all-scrotal SCOTUS, especially if you are the far-left, liberal New York Times.

I mean, this is the kind of thing that could have implications and shit, you know, for "society."

No comments: