Bush's Torture Memos
The memos use narrow reasoning to argue that certain actions that lay people might consider torture are in fact permissible. For example, one memo, dated March 6, 2003, reportedly says that if an interrogator's objective is not to cause severe pain, but to gain information, then their actions are legal - whether they cause severe pain or not.
- Christian Science Monitor
See also this Houston Chronicle editorial.
1 comment:
I saw a good article in the Washington Post about this as well.
Post a Comment