The Prisoner Abuse "Not So Bad" Syndrome
If you're like me, you work with people who don't mind a little prisoner molestation from time to time. After all, if knocking a few scrotums together prompts the testes to name names, then the cause of liberty is well-served. And even if the Red Cross estimate that 70-90% of the inmates were ordinary people picked up off the street, well, "All's fair in love and war," one colleague told me. "Didn't some feminist say that?" Scrota-knockery, here we come.
"The American public needs to understand, we're talking about rape and murder here. We're not just talking about giving people a humiliating experience; we're talking about rape and murder and some very serious charges," said Sen. Lindsay Graham, the distinguished Republican from South Carolina, after viewing the pictures the rest of us are waiting to be leaked to the press...
The other thing my peers like to ask is why American soldiers are held to a different standard than terrorists. After all, if the terrorists are "allowed" to run willy-nilly through the streets of Baghdad setting off road-side bombs, why can't we build nude pyramids and grab a fistful of gonads when it suits us? Well, because we're not fucking terrorists, dude! We're supposed to be held to a different standard. A non-raping standard, for instance. A non-murdering standard, imagine. A non-sodomizing standard, at least not when it's coming out of my goddam paycheck every week. The difference between terrorists and American soldiers is that we, as members of a democratic nation, are responsible for the behavior of our government. Not fair you say? You're goddam right it's not. Neither is pulling the slack of your co-workers when they want to bullshit about sports all afternoon. So what's more important? Honoring your own standards or competing for dominance by somebody else's?
1 comment:
Regarding your work mate who asked why "the terrorists are 'allowed' to run willy-nilly through the streets of Baghdad setting off road-side bombs....?"
You should remind this mental giant that Baghdad is not actually US territory. If we don't like being bombed there, then maybe we should not have gone in on false pretenses, all of which have since been destroyed.
Reasons we were supposedly going to save the day in Iraq:
1) Weapons of Mass Destruction--no weapons found
2) Stop torture in Iraq--we took up where Hussein left off
3) Remove Al-Qaeda hiding in Iraq--were mostly Saudis anyway, and probably there were more hiding in the US than Iraq anyway.
4) Set up democracy in Iraq--no democracy as of yet in Iraq, and if there was one it would be anti-US at this point, unless they extend the Help America Vote Republican Act to extend the Diebold voting machines to that country. In which case the Republicans will win in an unprecedented landslide.
Post a Comment